“Pravova derzhava”. Issue 36 (2025), pages 83–93.

DOI: 10.33663/0869-2491-2025-36-83-93

Parkhomenko Nataliia
The phenomenon of realisation of law in modern scientific discourse

It identifies conceptual approaches to the right-realisation activity as a phenomenon in domestic and foreign science, which is an important stage in the development of the theory of state and law, the modern doctrine of right-realisation.
The existence in the domestic legal science of a number of theoretical developments in the field of legal realisation, which mainly affect certain aspects of the legal realisation process, its individual forms, factors, results. However, there is no systemic view of the realization of law as a phenomenon that exists in society. At the same time, there is a tendency towards the dominance of the natural legal approach to the problem, as well as the identification of law enforcement with pravorealization, and the deepening of the applied aspect of pravorealization. In addition, a number of conceptual and methodological problems related to the peculiarities of the realization of law in the conditions of the information society, the operation of law in an emergency legal regime, the transformation of the essence and content of the legal process in connection with European integration currently remains controversial and requires scientific reflection and rethinking.
Representatives of foreign legal doctrine, especially the countries of case law, have always been mainly focused on the study of legal practice. Currently, among the debatable problems are: conceptual dimensions of legal regulation and its effectiveness; predetermination of effectiveness by the quality of legislation, and accordingly, the law-making process; the need for an integrated approach to the problems of ensuring legal realization; legal certainty as a factor in the effectiveness of the legal process; ensuring the rule of law during its implementation, etc.
Common for domestic and foreign science is an appeal to the problems of legal support for the use of artificial intelligence and digital technologies in view of the protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of subjects of public relations.

Key words: realization of law, domestic and foreign legal doctrine, enforcement, execution, use, observance, rule of law, understanding of law.

References

1. Kosilova O. I., Solodovnikova Kh. K. Prava i svobody liudyny i hromadianyna V.S. shtuchnyi intelekt: problemy aspekty. Informatsiia i pravo. № 4(35)/2020. S. 56–57.
2. Tam samo. S. 58.
3. Galligan D. J. Law in Modern Society. Oxford Academic Books, 2006. P. 293–309.
4. Tam samo. P. 310–330.
5. Tamanaha Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society Get access Arrow. Published online: 1 January 2010 Published in print: 19 July 200.
6. Raz Joseph Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. 2009. 424 r.
7. Barber N.W. The Principles of Constitutionalism.
8. Siegel J. The Inexorable Radicalization of textualism. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2009, vol. 158, p. 117.
9.  
   Edelson B., Stephenson M. The incompatibility of substantive canons and textualism. Harvard Law Review, vol. 137, № 2, p. 515–538.
10. Breyer Stephen Pragmatism or Textualism. Harvard Law Review. Volume 138. Issue 3. January 2025. R. 771-772.
11. Dagan H. “The Realist Conception of Law”, Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory (New York, 2013; online edn, Oxford Academic, 26 Sept. 2013)
12. Dagan, Hanoch, The Realist Conception of Law, Reconstructing American Legal Realism & Rethinking Private Law Theory (New York, 2013; online edn, Oxford Academic, 26 Sept. 2013.
13. Detalnishe dyv.: Kubko Ye.B. Pravo yak obiekt teoretyko-metodolohichnoho doslidzhennia (suchasni kontseptsii). Almanakh prava. 2024. Vypusk 15. S. 70.
14. See, e.g., Derek Parfit, Is Common-Sense Morality Self-Defeating?, 76 J. PHIL. 533, 534 (1979) (describing “Act Consequentialism” as “giv[ing] to all one common aim: the best possible outcome”)
15. Kubko Ye. B. Pravotvorchist, yurydychna praktyka i pravova nevyznachenist: metodolohichni aspekty vzaiemozviazku. Pravova derzhava: Shchorichnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy. Vypusk 35. Kyiv, 2024. S. 114.
16. Barnhizer, D. (2013). The Implementation Gap: What Causes Laws to Succeed or Fail? 2013. 16 р.
17. Kubko Ye. B. Pravo yak obiekt teoretyko-metodolohichnoho doslidzhennia (suchasni kontseptsii). Almanakh prava. 2024. Vypusk 15. C. 69.
18. Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning. Cambridge: MIT Press., Cuéllar, M. F., & Huq, A. Z. (forthcoming 2021). ‘Toward the Democratic Regulation of AI Systems: A Prolegomenon. Available at SSRN 3671011., Fagan, F., & Levmore, S. (2019). ‘The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Rules, Standards, and Judicial Discretion. Southern. California Law Review 93, 1., Flach, P. (2012). Machine learning: the art and science of algorithms that make sense of data. New York: Cambridge University Press., Gowder, P. (2018). ‘Transformative legal technology and the rule of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(supplement 1), 82-105, Huq, A.Z. (forthcoming 2021). ‘Constitutional Rights in the Machine Learning State Cornell Law Review 105., Michaels, A. C. (2019). ‘Artificial Intelligence, Legal Change, and Separation of Powers. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 88(4), 1083., Aziz Z. Huq, «Artificial Intelligence and the Rule of Law», Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series, No. 764 (2021).
19. Artificial Intelligence and the Rule of Law Shanghai Peoples Publishing House 2024. XIV, 482 r.
20. Blue Book on AI and Rule of Law in the World. Shanghai Peoples Publishing House 2024. XIV, 482 r.