“Pravova derzhava”. Issue 37 (2026), pages 203–213.

DOI: 10.33663/0869-2491-2026-37-203-213

Lvova Olena
Compliance with the law: interaction between legal and moral aspects

ISSN online: 2617-9776 print: 0869-2491

Introduction. A formal legal understanding of compliance with legal norms as a result of state coercion is increasingly proving insufficient to ensure effective legal regulation and stability of the legal order. Of particular importance is the study of the interaction between the legal and moral aspects of compliance with the law in the context of the establishment of the principle of the rule of law, which requires not only formal legality, but also the conformity of legal norms and practices with the fundamental values of justice, freedom, and human dignity. Purpose of the article. To study law enforcement as a form of law implementation in the context of the interaction between legal and moral factors.

Results. The essence of law enforcement lies in inaction (passive behavior), i.e., refraining from actions that are prohibited by legal norms. The use of legal coercion performs an important protective function in the process of law enforcement. Lawful behavior based solely on fear of sanctions will lose its effectiveness in the absence of sanctions.

It is argued that a person who is free, adequate, reasonable, and fair will comply with the relevant legal norms regardless of the threat of coercion. In this case, compliance with the law appears not only as a passive form of lawful behavior, but as a voluntary internal acceptance of legal requirements that corresponds to a person’s moral ideas about what is fair and proper. The moral dimension of compliance with the law is particularly evident in the categories of good faith, responsibility, and legal culture, which are also considered key factors in the stability of the legal order in Ukrainian doctrine. Legal literature emphasizes that legal norms whose content is based on or at least does not contradict traditional moral and religious postulates are implemented more effectively in the appropriate form, including through compliance with prohibitions, which in this case will no longer be perceived as restrictions on personal freedom due to the internal conviction of the need for such norms to ensure the progressive development of society and its institutions.

Conclusions. Compliance with the law is appropriately considered as a valuedriven form of law enforcement, in which legal coercion is balanced by the internal moral conviction of subjects in the necessity of lawful behavior. It is precisely this unity of the legal and the moral that corresponds to the modern understanding of the rule of law and ensures the stability of the legal order and the real effect of the law.

Compliance with the law as a voluntary form of lawful behavior is based on an awareness of the social value of the law, recognition of its fairness and moral legitimacy.

Keywords: compliance with the law, law enforcement, legal coercion, morality, lawful behavior.

 References

1. Kelsen H. Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967. 356 p. Oujda Library. URL: https://cdn.oujdalibrary.com/books/612/612-pure-theory-of-law-(www.tawcer.com).pdf 

2. Henry Cohen. Kelsens theory of law. Satholic lawyer. Journals at St. Johns Law Scholarship Repository. № 2. Volume 26. Spring 1981. R. 147–157. URL: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2087&context=tcl 

 3. Skakun O. F. Teoryia hosudarstva y prava. Kharkiv: Konsum, 2000. 704 s. S. 420 (in Ukr.). 

4. Zahalna teoriia prava: pidruchnyk / za zah. red. M. I. Koziubry. Kyiv: Vaite, 2015. 392 s. S. 235, 83, 84, 86 (in Ukr.).

 5. Hnatiuk M. D. Pravozastosuvannia ta yoho mistse v protsesi realizatsii prava. Dys. ...kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Kyiv, 2007. 211 s. S. 68–69 (in Ukr.). 

6. Arakelian R. M. Poniattia derzhavnoho prymusu v teorii prava. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. 2021. № 1. S. 391–393. S. 393. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-1/98 (in Ukr.). 

7. Rabinovych P. M. Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava i derzhavy: navch. posib. Vydannia 9-e, zi zminamy. Lviv: Krai, 2007. 192 s. S. 138 (in Ukr.).

 8. Shemshuchenko Yu. S. Pravo yak sotsialnyi fenomen. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka, 2008. 336 s. S. 42–44, 44–45, 45 (in Ukr.). 

9. uller L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964, p. 39. Sambridge university-press. URL:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-dephilosophie/article/abs/morality-of-law-by-lon-l-fuller-new-haven-yale-university-pressmontreal-mcgill-university-press-1964-pp-viii-202-500/FA09F4F64A200CAA674A5ED946AB3611  

10. Riznyk S. V. Konstytutsiinist normatyvnykh aktiv: sutnist, metodolohiia otsiniuvannia ta systema zabezpechennia v Ukraini: Avtoref. …dokt. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.02. Kyiv, 2021. 44 s. S. 19 (in Ukr.). 

11. Filosofiia prava / za red. Dzh. Feinberha, Dzh. Koulmena; per. z anhl. P. Tarashchuk. Kyiv: Osnovy, 2007. 1256 s. S. 14 (in Ukr.).

12. Shemshuchenko Yu. S. Teoretychni zasady vzaiemodii prava i kultury. Pravo ta kultura: teoriia i praktyka: Mizhnarodna nauk.-prakt. konf. m. Kyiv 15–16 trav. 1997 r. Kharkiv: MP «Lesia», 1997. S. 4–8 (in Ukr.). 

13. Koziubra M. I. Pravo, nauka ta inshi formy svitospryiniattia i metodolohiia: linii vzaiemozviazkiv. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky. 2018. Tom 2. S. 3–12. S. 8 (in Ukr.). 

14. Petryshyn O. V. Pravo yak sotsialne yavyshche: osoblyvosti yurydychnoho pidkhodu. Problemy filosofii prava. 2006–2007. Tom IV-V. S. 73–83. S. 76 (in Ukr.). 

15. Okuniev I. S. Pravove rehuliuvannia yak rezultat pravotvorchosti: pytannia efektyvnosti ta prohalyn. Optymizatsiia pravotvorchoi diialnosti: teoretyko-pravovi zasady: monohrafiia / za zah. red. N. M. Parkhomenko. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2025. S. 420–459. S. 428 (in Ukr.). 

16. Shyshko V. V. Kultorolohichi problemy pravotvorchosti: avtoref. …kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.12. Kyiv, 2004. 20 s. S. 3 (in Ukr.).

 17. Plavych S. V. Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady pravotvorchosti: dys. …kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Kyiv, 2009. 215 s. S. 42. 

18. Onishchenko N., Bereza S. Pravova kultura osoby v konteksti konstytutsiinoho rozvytku (realnyi stan ta prohramni tsili). Viche. 2011. № 19. URL: https://veche.kiev.ua/journal/2734/ (in Ukr.). 

19. Lvova O. L. Moralnyi vymir pravotvorchosti yak faktor yii optymizatsii. Optymizatsiia pravotvorchoi diialnosti: teoretyko-pravovi zasady: monohrafiia / za zahred. N. M. Parkhomenko. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2025. S. 167–191. S. 177 (in Ukr.).

Дата першого надходження рукопису до видання: 15.12.2025
Дата прийнятого до друку рукопису після рецензування: 03.03.2026
Дата публікації: 24.03.2026