“Pravova derzhava”. Issue 37 (2026), pages 96–112.

DOI: 10.33663/0869-2491-2026-37-96-112

Sirenko Vasyl
Reform of department judicial in Ukraine: new ideas

ISSN online: 2617-9776 print: 0869-2491

Introduction. A primary purpose is expounded in the article, ideas of conception of reformation of department judicial in Ukraine, conceptual principles of training of personnels of judge corps, and also relations between Supreme Court and нижчестоящими courts and judicial system of Ukraine. Responsibility of judge is examined for legality of the accepted court decisions, right for a judge on a judicial error, determination of limit of amount of judicial errors for the year of work of judge, responsibility for made decision, that is confessed by Європейським Court on human rights illegal, principles of remuneration of labour and providing of social package for judges, relations between judges and parties of process (by relatives and near judges, availability of justice to the citizens of Ukraine. Conceptual principles of implementation of court decisions and decision of problem of implementation of court decisions are in a civil legal sphere, pretsedentnist decisions of Supreme Court for all levels of courts and judges. 

The aim of the article. To investigate modern calls and issues of the day of judicial reform in Ukraine, European experience and європейські standards of department judicial, and also ideas for Ukraine, providing of efficiency of the system of implementation of court decisions and decisions of other organs, judicial protection of rights, freedoms and interests of physical, legal persons and state, problems of application of judicial legislation and judicial argumentation.

Methods and results. The primary purpose of this Conception are such system changes at the judicial system of Ukraine, what would do impossible a corruption in courts and provided only legality and law and order on all territory of Ukraine; would do impossible the decision of court on reasons of political expediency and would confirm legal definiteness, as a basic criterion of legality of court decisions; would erect to the minimum the errors of judges at the acceptance of court decisions; would strengthen responsibility of judges for the decisions; would provide a justice and respectability in the estimation of work of judges; would eradicate any pressure both external and internal influence on activity of judges; radically would change the trust of population to the courts and judges

Conclusions. It fundamentally new going near responsibility of legal entities. He requires the legislative providing from the side of parliament. In this case this approach is offered as an idea of providing of implementation of court decisions in the sphere of civil legal relations. Other approaches are usually possible, повˊязані with criminal pursuit of defendants, their bankruptcy. But to our opinion, the positive decision of this problem is possible only then, when the source of the material and financial providing of court decision will be found.

Keywords: judicial reform, прецедентність decisions, Supreme Court, European Court of Human Rights, responsibility of judges, justice, corruption, legal entity.

References

1. Velykyi entsyklopedychnyi yurydychnyi slovnyk. Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnytstvo «Yurydychna dumka», 2007. S. 706–707 (in Ukr.). 2. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 2 chervnia 2016 roku № 1402-VIII. Stattia 69. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text (in Ukr.).

Дата першого надходження рукопису до видання: 30.01.2026
Дата прийнятого до друку рукопису після рецензування: 03.03.2026 
Дата публікації: 24.03.2026